“Don’t Interpret That!”

-
Written by Amy Truman & Kelsey DeLonis
When working with an ASL (American Sign Language) interpreter, telling the interpreter “Don’t interpret that” is not only unethical, it also implies that the interpreter is unnecessary. This is true if either the Deaf client or the hearing client says this to the interpreter. The interpreter has a responsibility to make sure that both parties understand everything equally throughout the duration of the appointment.

If there is something that needs to be said privately, it is more appropriate to excuse yourself momentarily from the vicinity. The interpreter is provided for both parties equally. This back-and-forth interaction cannot proceed smoothly without the interpreter fulfilling their entire role. As mentioned in our blog “How To Use an ASL Interpreter 101,” by the time you can say “Don’t interpret that,” odds are the interpreter has already interpreted it. At the basest level, asking an interpreter to omit information is unethical. When interacting with any individual who can hear what is being said, we are not afforded that extra filtered layer of communication.

Treat your Deaf client the same as you would any other person, with the understanding that they have a basic human right to equal access of everything happening in their environment. To take advantage of the fact that the Deaf person won’t hear your words or that the hearing person doesn’t know ASL, and to include the interpreter as a part of that censorship, is to invite distrust between everyone involved in the interaction. It is important to keep in mind that when an interpreter is in the room, he/she is not your filter. The interpreter functions as a bridge providing full access to the entire situation. The Deaf person is as much your colleague, patient, client, or team member as any other person who does not require an interpreter.

To learn more about LTC and interpretation call us at 888-456-1626 or visit us online at LTClanguagesolutions.com.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Language Interpretation in American K-12 Schools

-
Image
by Doug Price The provision of language interpretation services in American schools is guided by federal legislation, including the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Educational Opportunities Act of 1974. These laws mandate that school districts must take reasonable steps to overcome language barriers that impede students' equal access to education. As a result, school districts have implemented various strategies to meet the language needs of their diverse student populations. These strategies play a crucial role in ensuring effective communication and educational equity for students who are non-native English speakers or have limited proficiency in the English language. But the key consumers of interpretation services are parents, not students. For the most part, these students are 2 nd and 3 rd generation Americans who grow up speaking English outside the home even if they still speak their native tongue at home with their parents. Parents are the ones who most often
Read more

Interpreter Quality Assurance

-
Image
 by: Jasmyn Sylvas The role of our LTC interpreters holds great significance in maintaining the integrity, reliability, and excellence of interpreting assignments within our company. As language barriers continue to weaken in our interconnected world, the demand for accurate and culturally sensitive communication becomes increasingly essential. Interpreters play a pivotal role in upholding these standards and ensuring that communication flows seamlessly across linguistic boundaries. Here's why interpreter quality assurance is important to us here at LTC Ensuring Accuracy: Language interpretation is a complex and nuanced process. Attention to detail minimizes the risk of misunderstandings, misinformation, or misinterpretation, which could have significant consequences in various contexts, such as legal proceedings, healthcare, business negotiations, and more. Cultural Sensitivity: Effective communication extends beyond mere translation of words. Cultural nuances, idiomatic exp
Read more

VRS vs VRI: Aren’t They the Same Service?

-
Image
Written by  Bethany Jamison, NIC Every industry comes with distinct vernacular! A common misconception specific to the American Sign Language (ASL) Interpreting Community is that the use of Video Remote Interpreting (VRI) is the same as using Video Relay Services (VRS). Although both types of service are provided via a digital platform and use similar equipment, these services are quite different. Let’s take a closer look.            According to the Federal Communication Commission’s (FCC) website, “ VRS, like other forms of Telecommunication Relay Services (TRS) allows persons who are deaf or hard-of-hearing (DHH) to communicate through the telephone system with hearing persons. The VRS caller, using a television or a computer with a video camera device and a broadband (high-speed) Internet connection, contacts a VRS caller, who is a qualified interpreter. They communicate with each other in sign language through a video link. The VRS caller then places a telephone call to th
Read more