VRS vs VRI: Aren’t They the Same Service?

-
Written by Bethany Jamison, NIC
Every industry comes with distinct vernacular! A common misconception specific to the American Sign Language (ASL) Interpreting Community is that the use of Video Remote Interpreting (VRI) is the same as using Video Relay Services (VRS). Although both types of service are provided via a digital platform and use similar equipment, these services are quite different. Let’s take a closer look.          
According to the Federal Communication Commission’s (FCC) website, “VRS, like other forms of Telecommunication Relay Services (TRS) allows persons who are deaf or hard-of-hearing (DHH) to communicate through the telephone system with hearing persons. The VRS caller, using a television or a computer with a video camera device and a broadband (high-speed) Internet connection, contacts a VRS caller, who is a qualified interpreter. They communicate with each other in sign language through a video link. The VRS caller then places a telephone call to the party the VRS user wishes to call. The VRS caller relays the conversation back and forth between the parties -- in sign language with the VRS user, and by voice with the called party. No typing or text is involved.” 
Photo credit Convorelay
Essentially what this means is there’s an ASL interpreter at a call center with a computer screen and headset. When a person calls a DHH person, they are connected audibly to an interpreter through a VRS provider (i.e. Sorenson, ZVRS, Convo).
The interpreter connects the call to the intended party, then interprets the phone conversation between the two, utilizing the camera to communicate with the DHH participant and the headset for the person using a phone. Visually this looks very much like Facetime or Skype. This is also the process when a call is initiated by a DHH caller. The VRS process allows communication to flow and both parties use their native languages through the interpreter.
Who pays for VRS services? VRS is not paid for by the folks using the service. VRS providers are compensated for their costs from the Interstate TRS Fund, which is overseen by the FCC. For more specific content regarding the FCC’s requirements for VRS providers and users, check this out: https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/video-relay-services.
So, what is VRI? The National Association of the Deaf defines VRI as “When in-person, on-site interpreting services are not immediately available, technology now provides for an interim solution in the form of off-site interpreting services, called Video Remote Interpreting (VRI). VRI uses videoconferencing technology, equipment, and a high-speed Internet connection with sufficient bandwidth to provide the services of a qualified interpreter, usually located at a call center, to people at a different location.” 
How is this different? VRI interpreters are not interpreting “phone conversations,” as described above with VRS, a service regulated and paid for by the Federal Government. With VRI service, real-time interpreting in multiple settings (like hospitals and businesses) is happening while the DHH and hearing persons are in the same location, and the interpreter is off-site. Who pays for this service? The answer is -- the same persons that would pay for onsite interpreting services are responsible for the bill when using VRI. VRI can be set up as an “on demand” service OR by appointment. These factors, along with prices per minute, etc. are determined on a contract basis by the interpreting agency providing the services and the client.
VRS and VRI can both be effective forms of communication for DHH and hearing persons to communicate in a variety of different situations and physical settings. There are many options available. More information about LTC’s offerings can be found at https://ltclanguagesolutions.com/interpretation/video/.

 Learn more about LTC and VRS/VRI or call us at 888-456-1626. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Language Interpretation in American K-12 Schools

-
Image
by Doug Price The provision of language interpretation services in American schools is guided by federal legislation, including the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Educational Opportunities Act of 1974. These laws mandate that school districts must take reasonable steps to overcome language barriers that impede students' equal access to education. As a result, school districts have implemented various strategies to meet the language needs of their diverse student populations. These strategies play a crucial role in ensuring effective communication and educational equity for students who are non-native English speakers or have limited proficiency in the English language. But the key consumers of interpretation services are parents, not students. For the most part, these students are 2 nd and 3 rd generation Americans who grow up speaking English outside the home even if they still speak their native tongue at home with their parents. Parents are the ones who most often ...
Read more

Interpreter Quality Assurance

-
Image
 by: Jasmyn Sylvas The role of our LTC interpreters holds great significance in maintaining the integrity, reliability, and excellence of interpreting assignments within our company. As language barriers continue to weaken in our interconnected world, the demand for accurate and culturally sensitive communication becomes increasingly essential. Interpreters play a pivotal role in upholding these standards and ensuring that communication flows seamlessly across linguistic boundaries. Here's why interpreter quality assurance is important to us here at LTC Ensuring Accuracy: Language interpretation is a complex and nuanced process. Attention to detail minimizes the risk of misunderstandings, misinformation, or misinterpretation, which could have significant consequences in various contexts, such as legal proceedings, healthcare, business negotiations, and more. Cultural Sensitivity: Effective communication extends beyond mere translation of words. Cultural nuances, idiomatic exp...
Read more

6 Ways Translations Can Go Wrong

-
Image
by  Doug Price When translation goes wrong, it can lead to misunderstandings, confusion, and sometimes even humorous or embarrassing situations. Here are a few examples of when translation errors can occur: 1. Literal Translation: Sometimes, translators may rely too heavily on word-for-word translation without considering the cultural context or idiomatic expressions. This can result in awkward or nonsensical translations. For example, a literal translation of the English phrase "It's raining cats and dogs" into another language may confuse the listener who is unfamiliar with the idiomatic meaning. 2. Cultural Nuances: Languages often have unique cultural nuances and expressions that may not have direct equivalents in other languages. Translators need to be aware of these nuances to accurately convey the intended meaning. Failure to do so can lead to misinterpretation or loss of important cultural references. 3. Machine Translation Errors: While machine translation too...
Read more